Thursday, March 1, 2012

The Moral Authority of Mormon and Roman Catholic Bishops and Their Evangelical Pals

What? What? WHAT?!

It’s like a bad joke opening, “Two Roman Catholics and a Mormon walk into a bar and demand that all the women stop using contraception...”

To make the joke complete let's examine the “moral authority” credentials of these three clowns and that of the "religious authorities" who want to make religion – say the “issue” that President Obama is not a “real Christian," or he is “anti-religious freedom" – an election year talking point.

Who is it that claims this moral authority and that also demands to be taken seriously? Why the Roman Catholic bishops and a former Mormon missionary of course!

I didn’t bring this up, they did! So cool your jets everyone who only wants religion to be respected and never criticized, even when that "religion" plays hardball politics.

Who are these paragons of tolerance demanding that the rest of us respect the reclassification of robbing women of their right to use contraceptives as “religious freedom?”

Back to our “two Catholics and a Mormon walk into a bar,” or rather back to Newt, Mitt and Rick walk into a bar. So what about the moral authority of the religious bodies they are "defending" -- as a way to actually attack the President? They brought religion up so lets talk about it! What right do they or their bishops have to lecture the rest of us?

When Mitt was working for his church as a missionary he was working for a church that at that time banned black men from being ministers.

When Newt and  Rick speak for their church’s tender conscience on not being forced to insure women’s health, they are speaking for a church body run by old  men who have presided over 50 years of covering up child abuse, sexual molestation and the codling of fascist regimes from Franco to Mussolini.

Like I said, this may be impolite to mention but the rest of us didn’t start talking about religion as an election issue in order to depose our first black president.

And what of the fellow traveler evangelicals ready to yell that they may be "personally" for "allowing" women to use contraception but that they just want to "defend religious liberty?"

Aren't they the people spouting anti-Muslim nonsense from coast to coast? Aren't they the people trying to ban gay men and women from marrying? These evangelicals seem eager to strip lots of people of actual rights these days while crying wolf about their own.

 Like they say, people who live in class houses shouldn't throw stones. If the bishops want this fight, bring it on!

Frank Schaeffer is a writer. He is just launching a speaking tour called Theocracy or Democracy.


Steve D said...

My name is Steve (sung to the motif from Close Encounters of the Third Kind). Or do the comment instructions mean SIGN your own name?

Anyhoo, I'm a Catholic, but I believe:
1. It's time religious organizations paid taxes. If the church catches fire, they'll want the fire department to show up. Churches that genuinely provide social services can deduct those expenses, just like people.
2. Religious bodies should be held liable for their teachings. If your teachings hurt someone, you pay. If some nut job uses them as a license to hurt others, you pay.
3. When it comes to things like evolution, the Bible says "submit to those in lawful authority." SCIENCE, not some fundy cult, is the lawful authority.

khughes1963 said...

Frank, you are absolutely right. The bishops are wrong on this one, and they have lost. I am a Catholic, and I think the leadership of my own church forfeited its moral authority over sexual abuse.

Dennis Jernberg said...

Let's not forget one more thing the Catholic Church in its infinite mercy did: enslaving Irish girls for the unforgivable crime of being sexual and thinking for themselves. It's not just boy-lovin' priests the Irish are up in arms about, after all...